How We Will Oppose Sharia And Islam

From The Patriot Word:

Thursday, December 30, 2010How We Will Oppose Sharia and Islam...


Posted by Walter L. Brown Jr. at 8:06 AM Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Google Buzz

How to Oppose Sharia and Islam



Articles of the type that appeared in Pajamas Media today strategizing the best methods to oppose Sharia are a rarity. They are extremely important and substantially more attention needs to be applied to the best ways to oppose, stop the advance, and bring about the end of Islam. The author focuses primarily on identifying the best legal arguments against Sharia law:



The Five Best Arguments Against Sharia in the United States



1. U.S. law is the “supreme law of the land,” no exceptions.

2. Sharia, as “divine revelation,” is inherently undemocratic.

3. Many aspects of Sharia are flagrantly unconstitutional.

4. Sharia is fundamentally religious law, and should be inapplicable to U.S. criminal or civil law.

5. Subjectively, Sharia is a discriminatory and cruel legal system.



I agree with everything suggested except limiting the battle to these few albeit strong positions. I like the wolf-pack approach where Islam is attacked from every conceivable angle, this has the effect of forcing them to defend themselves everywhere and every step they take becomes an expensive legal battle, grid lock them until we can get the ball moving in the opposite direction. Here are some other angles of opposition:



Oppose them as a threat to national and public safety: Criminal, Anti-terror, and Sedition Laws

Oppose them as a threat to local character: Zoning Laws

Oppose them as a threat to citizens rights: Civil Rights Act and Anti-discrimination Laws

Oppose them philosophically and intellectually: Bankrupt ideas and distorted history

Oppose them economically: Trade sanctions against state supporters, boycotts of businesses

Oppose them militarily: Ending the state sponsorship of Islam, and implanting secular constitutions following unconditional surrender.

Oppose them publicly: Use history and their psychotic texts to form undeniable association that Islam is Evil, always has been and always will be.

Stigmatize Islam to the point that no one would readily choose it, defend it, or want to be part of it and you will have defeated it because only a very small majority would remain.



Break through every social barrier with an overwhelming wave of evidence of their actions and clear linkages to the Koran, Surrah, Sharia, and Islam which demand the grotesque evil that faithful Muslims are obliged to carry out.



We must recognize that Islam is our enemy and act appropriately, it will not end on its own, nor will it reform itself. It's a problem that must be cured at its source like Fascism and Japanese Imperialism.



A separation between good and evil is necessary, philosophically, and legally at a minimum and possibly physically as well. Not all Arabs, Italians, Germans, or Japanese were dangerous during WWII, however they all carried this unfortunate but necessary stigma because of the actions and philosophies of their countrymen.



Americans bear no ill will toward any group of people, if we are forced to fight you we will do so with the idea of defeating that which we are fighting. As it is impossible to discern with any confidence which of our Muslims residents will aid and abed our Muslim enemies, Muslims should easily understand the uncomfortable position we are forced into. Muslims choosing to advocate and advance the cause of Islam inspite of the at-war status we seem unavoidably headed for should not be surprise when they suffer stigmatization for their ideas. Muslims, Italians, Japanese, and German supporters of the Axis Powers during WWII were prosecuted for treason under the Smith Act which remains an option today as does use of the Patriot Act. Actions that we hold reprehensible but necessary, like war itself.



As the clouds of conflict between Islam and non-Islamic societies become ever darker, a famous and well stated admission of the necessity to engage in war after countless offenses have been suffered and all manner of plea for redress have been ignored, is appropriate.



We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends...



Author: Thomas Jefferson Published July 4th, 1776..