From The Washington Legal Foundation:
by Charles M. English
Washington Legal Foundation
January 27, 2012
This legal backgrounder explores how the present Supreme Court’s textual reading of the First Amendment affects pending governmental efforts to compel private party speech with respect to tobacco (Food and Drug Administration regulations requiring new warning labels including specific government prescribed graphic images) and cell phones (San Francisco’s new requirement that cell phone retailers provide government prescribed posters, “fact-sheets,” and warning stickers on promotional literature). Both laws are presently enjoined and headed for expedited review by the United States Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the Ninth Circuit, respectively.
No comments:
Post a Comment