U.S. Supreme Court Asked To Review DADT Policy

From the AP:

Nov 5, 10:35 PM EDT






Supreme Court asked to review gay military ban



By LISA LEFF

Associated Press









Advertisement









Multimedia

Gays in the Military

Gay Rights Advocates March in DC

DC rights activist talks gays and government

Gay marriage timeline

Interactive: The Faces of Gay Marriage

Gay couples marry in California

Same-Sex Couple Reflects on California Ruling





Documents

Iowa Supreme Court's Ruling on Gay Marriage (April 3, 2009)

California Supreme Court's Ruling on Gay Marriage (May 15, 2008)





Latest News

Marines' leader: Keep policy on gays in military

Argentine gays proud of 500 same-sex marriages



First gay Episcopal bishop to retire in 2013



Supreme Court asked to review gay military ban



Disciplinary hearing to continue for Mich. lawyer







PHOTO GALLERY



Gay Marriage





Document

Audio slideshow on soldier who suffered a brain injury

PDF copy of wounded soldiers complaining about treatment in recovery unit

Army's new electronic warfare manual





Multimedia

Gays in the military timeline

Marines Train in Model Afghan Village

Military Greeters Welcome Troops Home

The MRAP vs. The HUMVEE



Honoring the Fallen





Database



Search the DOD Surplus Database



Latest News

Marines stand by off coast of storm-battered Haiti

Military wants to fly more sophisticated drones



US officials: Military wants to boost aid to Yemen



Obama sees chance to overturn ban on military gays



AP sources: Most US troops, families say gays OK









Buy AP Photo Reprints



















Related Multimedia

Compare the M4 and Other Rifles









SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- A Republican gay rights group on Friday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow a California trial judge's order barring enforcement of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gays in the military to go back into effect.



Lawyers for Log Cabin Republicans asked the high court to vacate a 2-1 decision Monday by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals keeping "don't ask, don't tell" in place until it considers the government's appeal of the judge's decision declaring the policy unconstitutional.



The Log Cabin group argued that the 9th Circuit panel abused its discretion when it blocked U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips' order requiring the armed forces to allow openly gay Americans to enlist and serve.



It said the divided panel erred in accepting the Pentagon's claim that it needed more time to develop procedures for integrating gay service members and "gave no consideration whatsoever to the injury that will befall" while "don't ask, don't tell" is in place.



"Unless the court of appeals stay is vacated, the respondents will be free to continue to investigate and discharge American service members for no reason other than their homosexuality, in violation of their due process and First Amendment rights," the group's lawyers wrote.



The request was directed to Justice Anthony Kennedy, who handles emergency motions from the 9th Circuit. Kennedy on Friday evening asked the Department of Justice to respond by 5 p.m. Wednesday.



President Barack Obama, meanwhile, has pledged to push the Senate to repeal the policy in the lame duck session before a new Congress is sworn in.



The policy was lifted for eight days last month after Phillips ruled that it violates the civil rights of gay Americans and issued an injunction barring the Pentagon from applying it. The Obama administration appealed and asked the appeals court to reinstate the ban until it could hear arguments on the broader constitutional issues next year.



"It is unfortunate the Obama Justice Department has forced the Log Cabin Republicans to go to the Supreme Court," R. Clarke Cooper, the group's executive director, said.



In their filing Friday, Log Cabin's lawyers disputed that the military would be harmed if the policy were suspended immediately.



Phillips' order "does not order the military to redesign its barracks, to retool its pay scales or benefits, to reordain its chaplains, to rewrite its already extensive anti-harassment or 'dignity and respect'" rules, or anything else," they said. "The district court's injunction requires only one thing: to cease investigating and discharging servicemembers for reasons unrelated to their performance and military ability."



---



Associated Press Writer Mark Sherman in Washington contributed to this story.



© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.