Religious Tolerance, Not Freedom: Learn The Difference Or Perish

From The Patriot Word:

Saturday, July 24, 2010Religious Tolerance not Freedom: Learn the difference or Perish


Religious Tolerance not Freedom: Learn the difference or Perish



While freedom appeals to our noble and altruistic senses, we recognize that it is dangerous to remove all possibility of limitations. Freedom is like the honor system, it only works if everyone is honorable. It only takes one person willing to steal the unguarded work of the others to destroy the honor system. Tolerance on the other hand is based on good behavior, and runs the risk of being eliminated by legislative action.



Tolerance = Permitted, within limits;

Freedom = Unrestricted;



Freedom is an unstable system based on trust, whereas tolerance is a stable system based on mutual respect.



The question of how to regulate freedom of expression was one of many challenges and the founding fathers. The repeated history of religious extremism and persecutions in England and in Massachusetts were vivid recent history. On the other hand, they almost without exception strongly religious men and would never have established a system of government that did not permit religious expression.



The solution they sough was one that permitted free expression, ensured that the government stayed out of the issue, and provide a means of reigning in damaging expression of rights.



The solution that they arrived at was Religious Tolerance with the limitation that this right can be removed by due process of law (a trial by jury) and with a mandate preventing the government from broadly prohibiting or establishing religions.



Here’s how they did it:

The First Amendment prevented the dangerous mixture of government and religion, which has produced religious theocracies, persecutions and other tyrannical structures. The First Amendment also prevent prohibition of any particular religion to ensure that and agnostic or atheistic state would never be established. The clearly worded meaning of the first amendment is of applicability to Congress only, which makes perfect sense with the intention and function.



Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.



The Fifth Amendment not the first recognized all mankind’s Natural Right to Liberty and established limits for exercise thereof. Freedom of expression is clearly one aspect of the Natural Right of Liberty. The limitation permitting removal of the Right of Expression by due process of law, established Tolerance of Expression vs. Freedom of Expression as the Law of the Land.



Amendment V

No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. (Simplified to eliminate parts not relevant to the discussion at hand)



Here’s the original version for you to confirm: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

This ability to remove the freedom of expression of individuals and organizations also considered individuals under the law is the difference is literally life and death. Today we face Religious and Political Threats which exceed the legal limits of tolerance. Recognizing that we are not prohibited from taking action against them is an important step in self-preservation.



The Cult of Islam is conducting the Third Jihad, there intention is abolish our form of government and way of life. Liberals are also actively trying to abolish our form of government using the Cloward - Piven Strategy.



Both of these activities constitute treasonous activities against the United States Constitution are punishable under state and federal laws. Both of these groups are hiding behind misconstructions of the United States Constitution, a practice that will continue until we end it.



We are losing our Form of Government and Way of Life. We feel helpless to stop it, but nothing could be farther from the truth. Recognizing the true, plain language meaning of the United States Constitution is an empowering experience. The tools we need have been graciously provided to us, all we need to do is to have the courage to use them.



I have advocated the closing of all Mosques, Islamic Organizations, and Schools. I adamantly maintain that this common sense position is legal and morally correct. I advocate, Crimes Against Humanity Trials for the huge number of Muslims that have committed atrocities in the name of religion. I advocate treason against the United States charges and prosecution for persons involved in the Cloward and Piven strategy to abolish our form of government through economic collapse.



My positions are legally supported and exactly what the Founding Fathers would have done, if they were here..

I’m slightly more optimistic than Samuel Adams who said, "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other". My view of the situation is that as long as we have a small group of courageous persons willing to tell the truth and fight for what is good and right with every legal method available, Our Constitution is more than up to the task of governing.

In general, Americans are a tolerant people, not ignorant. The founding fathers understood the difference between tolerance and freedom isn’t it about time we did the same?

Posted by Walter L. Brown Jr. at 6:22 PM